Portfolio experience at scale
Scott D. Paul has overseen portfolios involving more than 350 pending prosecution matters and coordinated filing strategies across the United States, Europe, and Asia.
Scott’s experience ↗Your ambitions cross borders.
Your patent strategy should, too.
Strategic U.S. patent prosecution and portfolio support for European patent firms and multinational companies.
A shared understanding.
A U.S. perspective.
The right U.S. counsel understands both the patent and the people behind it. We shape the engagement around your role, your priorities, and your way of working.
Work with U.S. patent attorneys who respect the originating firm’s relationship and coordinate through agreed instructions and communication channels.
A dedicated U.S. relationship attorney, with backup coverage and agreed reporting responsibilities.
U.S. claim strategy, examiner responses, interviews, and continuation planning coordinated with your wider portfolio.
Confirm scope, deadlines, fees, approval steps, and filing responsibilities before work begins.
Engage us for a technology area, a specialist matter, overflow support, or a broader U.S. portfolio. We work with your in-house team and existing counsel to define the right role.
Connect prosecution decisions and continuation opportunities with your technology and commercial priorities.
Agree prosecution guidelines, budgets, reporting, matter codes, and billing requirements for your engagement.
Address conflicts, portfolio transitions, vendor requirements, and information handling before accepting work.
Thoughtful prosecution at each stage.
A coordinated strategy across the portfolio.

U.S. national-stage entry from PCT applications, application drafting, and filing coordination. Assess the U.S. approach in the context of your existing disclosure and international patent family.
Explore European applicant servicesOffice Action responses, examiner interviews, restriction responses, U.S. patent eligibility strategy, and ex parte appeals to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
See prosecution servicesContinuation and divisional planning, invention intake, portfolio transitions, budgeting, and reporting. Coordinate the U.S. work with European counsel and your broader business objectives.
How we workTechnical analysis and U.S. patent strategy for inter partes review, ex parte reexamination, and related USPTO and PTAB proceedings. Scope and representation are confirmed for each matter.
Explore the wider U.S. practiceTECHNICAL FLUENCY,
ACROSS DISCIPLINES.
Predictable pricing for common U.S. prosecution tasks, with the scope and fee arrangement agreed before work begins.
View the full published fee scheduleAddyHart professional fees only. USPTO fees and third-party costs are separate. Published pricing is subject to the agreed scope and engagement terms; confirm current fees before instructing us.
Scott D. Paul has overseen portfolios involving more than 350 pending prosecution matters and coordinated filing strategies across the United States, Europe, and Asia.
Scott’s experience ↗Michael K. Kelly has prosecuted hundreds of U.S. applications and coordinated patent protection across Europe and Asia, including aerospace, semiconductors, medical devices, and software.
Michael’s experience ↗Heather King coordinates portfolio transitions, USPTO formalities, client reporting, foreign correspondence, and client-specific prosecution procedures.
Heather’s experience ↗These examples describe individual professionals’ experience across their careers. Staffing and scope are agreed for each engagement.

Registered Patent Attorney
Licensed Professional Engineer
AI, software, medical devices, automation, and U.S. prosecution strategy, informed by prior engineering experience.

Registered Patent Attorney
Chemist & Chemical Engineer
Patent strategy spanning medical devices, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, polymers, and complex manufacturing systems.

Registered Patent Attorney
Electrical & Industrial Engineering
U.S. and international portfolio experience in semiconductors, aerospace, medical devices, software, and cloud technologies.
U.S. analogous-art doctrine and the EPO problem-solution approach.
Read the analysisA comparative perspective on U.S. and EU design protection after LKQ.
Read the analysisCommunication, commitment, and file-history risk across patent offices.
Read the analysisYes. We agree the U.S. engagement, instruction channels, reporting, and approval process with the originating firm. We respect the firm’s client relationship and coordinate responsibilities before work begins.
Yes. We can discuss a direct U.S. engagement with an in-house team, including a specialist matter, overflow support, a technology segment, or broader portfolio work. Acceptance follows conflicts review and a written engagement agreement.
The figures shown are AddyHart professional fees for the specified services. USPTO fees and third-party expenses are separate. We confirm the applicable scope, fees, and engagement terms before accepting instructions.
Send a nonconfidential overview of your organization, the type of U.S. support you need, and any relevant timing. Please wait for an agreed channel and instructions before sending confidential information or documents.
Tell us how your firm or in-house team would like to work with U.S. patent counsel.
europe@divergentpatentlaw.comStart with Brandon R. Theiss, Partner and U.S. patent attorney. Request an introductory call ↗
Suggest times and your time zone so availability can be confirmed. View contact details ↗